Team Force Tech

TeamForce Technologies is a broker CRM and brokerage ecosystem vendor based in Paphos, Cyprus. The brand belongs to Powerforce Managment Ltd, which the privacy policy states plainly: "TeamForce Technologies is a brand of Powerforce Management Ltd". The contact page lists a Cyprus office at Leoforos Nikolaou Nikolaidi & Kinyras-1, 8010, Paphos and a second office in Business Bay, Dubai.

Its buyer is an FX or CFD brokerage, not a prop firm. Trade coverage describes it as a company that "provides customer relations management (CRM) solutions for FX and CFDs brokers as well as for iGaming companies". The product set is sold either as standalone modules or as a combined ecosystem: CRM, client zone, branded web and mobile trading front ends, IB and affiliate management, communication tools and AI features.

For a prop firm operator the important fact is on the vendor's own navigation: Prop Trading, TFT White Label and iGaming are all marked "Coming Soon". An unlinked page at /prop/ exists with the heading PROP TRADE and the line "COMING SOON!!", and its body text is recycled CRM marketing copy rather than prop product detail. The only shipped route to prop firms is the Match-Trader integration announced in February 2026.

Company age claims do not reconcile. The about page says the team has spent "over 6 years to crafting exceptional broker software" and a counter reads "+6 Years Operation"; LinkedIn shows Founded 2019 and a 51-200 employee band; the registered entity ΗΕ 447193 shows a registration date of 17/05/2023 on a third-party registry mirror; and both teamforcetech.com and teamforcetechnologies.com were registered in February 2025. Treat every age and scale figure as self-reported and unaudited.

TeamForce sells ten named modules that it says combine into a single ecosystem. The CRM is the centre of it — the vendor describes it as designed "to become the heart of your business", integrating with the broker's liquidity providers, VoIP, e-KYC, trading platform and payment solutions, and presenting one console across sales, marketing, finance and dealing with management reports and live dashboards.

The Clientzone is the trader-facing portal: full financial and trading history, market data and analysis, self-onboarding through "AI powered KYC functions", funding, internal transfers and withdrawals, plus access to the web trader, branded apps, copy trading and IB registration. IB & Affiliate Management is a multi-level tiered system with rewards and rebates based on deposit, P&L and traded volume, multiple campaigns per partner, and a partner login showing performance and marketing materials.

The Risk Management module is the one a prop operator will scrutinise, and it is squarely broker-side. TeamForce lists "exposure metering, auto margin calls and risk notifications to a complete order management system and A/B Book management tools", with automation and triggered workflows, and calls it "a very useful and practical tool for inhouse dealing rooms". There is no published rule engine, no drawdown type configuration, no consistency rule, no news filter and no automated breach action — the vocabulary of prop evaluation is absent, which follows from the prop product being unreleased.

AI Technology spans AI-powered KYC, call transcription, translation, call sentiment, violation detection and AI CRM notes, with an AI SDR for automated lead engagement added in 2025. Reporting arrived as four dashboards — Agent, Manager, Mobile Command and Security — plus a Retention dashboard.

TeamForce does not run a matching engine. It supplies the client-facing layer and connects to whichever trading server the broker already uses — the mobile and web apps are "directly integrated with your trading server for a fully synchronized experience across all user interfaces".

Named platform relationships come from the vendor's own 2025 review, which lists under "Completed integrations and Partnerships": Match-Trader, MetaQuotes, CTrader and Match-Trade Technologies. The cTrader work was reported on 20 November 2025: "TeamForce Technologies has integrated its CRM system and mobile applications with cTrader." MetaTrader 5, MT5, cTrader, Spotware and match-trade technologies logos all appear on the 3rd-parties page. No MT4, DXtrade, TradeLocker, Rithmic or Tradovate support is evidenced anywhere.

What the trader actually opens is TeamForce's own front end. The Web Trader offers Basic and Pro modes, unlimited charting windows, trading directly from the chart and pending orders with stop loss and take profit; a LITE WebTrader was announced in 2026, alongside dark mode and drag-to-adjust stop loss and take profit. Mobile Applications are branded iOS and Android builds published to the App Store and Google Play, carrying deposits, KYC, push notifications and in-app P2P calling.

Asset classes and interface languages are not published as lists. The AI layer performs translation and transcription, but TeamForce never states which languages the trader interface ships in — worth asking if you sell into LATAM or India, the two regions its own commentary highlights.

TeamForce publishes a named integration list exactly once, in its 2025 year-in-review, under the heading "Completed integrations and Partnerships": Match-Trader, MetaQuotes, CTrader, Match-Trade Technologies, Voiso, CommPeak, Praxis, BridgerPay, SumSub and "Ark Technologies(under construction)". Ark is the only one the vendor itself flags as not finished, so it is recorded here as roadmap rather than live.

The /3rd-parties/ page is not an integration catalogue in the usual sense, and this matters when reading it. It carries roughly 93 logos, every one of them with the placeholder alt text "Award 1", and the page text names no company at all — it describes "relationships with industry professionals such as trading servers, liquidity providers, VoIP operators, payment providers and cashiers, exchanges, corporate service providers" and offers "introductions to trusted partners". Those are categories and an introductions service, not documented software integrations.

The wall itself is mixed. It includes payment providers (Praxis, dLocal Go, Mercado Pago, Conekta, Clip and many smaller PSPs), KYC vendors (Sumsub, Shufti), VoIP and contact-centre tools (Voiso, CommPeak, Coperato, Asterisk, VoiceSpin), brokerage infrastructure (B2Broker, Brokeree, Broctagon Fintech Group), business tools (Brevo, Zoho, Hotjar, tawk.to, Postmark), card schemes and wallets (Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay) and cryptocurrency marks (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether and others, which are assets rather than vendors). It also includes financial regulators — the FCA, ASIC, CySEC, the DFSA and others — and law and consulting firms such as Tal Ron, Drihem & Co. and MAP S.Platis. Those belong to the corporate-services introductions the page describes; none of them is an integration, and none is a certification.

The notable gap is direction: there is no documented public API, webhook or developer portal, so anything not on the list above is a bespoke build rather than something a firm can wire up itself.

Almost nothing is published here. TeamForce lists "system hosting and maintenance" among its ancillary services, which establishes that it hosts the platform, but it names no hosting region, no cloud provider, and never says whether a firm gets a dedicated instance and database or shares a multi-tenant one.

The only geography statement is in the data processing terms: TeamForce "shall be entitled to transfer personal data freely within the European Union or the European Economic Area", and if data is processed outside the EU each party must ensure compliance. That is a transfer permission, not a residency guarantee, so no data residency commitment is recorded.

One older source points a different way. A separate site for the same registered entity, power-force.net, advertising the Power Force brand, states that "Team Force CRM offers three different installation methods according to your request" — Cloud Setup, Hybrid Setup and ON-PREMISE Setup. That claim appears nowhere on teamforcetech.com and the page is plainly older, so it is noted rather than relied on. If self-hosting or on-premise deployment matters to you, put it directly to the vendor.

For an operator this is a live diligence item: hosting region, tenancy model, failover, backup schedule and latency to your trading venue are all unpublished and should be written into the contract.

Branding of the trader-facing layer is real and specific. TeamForce sells "your own branded mobile applications that are available for download from IOS and Android stores" and a branded web trader, with the pitch that clients search the store for the firm's app rather than a generic one. Client area templates were added in 2026.

Whether that amounts to white label is genuinely unclear from the site, and the contradiction is worth naming: the firm's brand goes on the apps and portal, yet the main navigation lists "TFT White Label" as Coming Soon. Both statements are the vendor's own, so neither is asserted here. Ask specifically whether vendor branding is absent across the whole trader journey, whose developer accounts the apps publish under, and what the unreleased white label product adds.

Bespoke development is the stronger claim. TeamForce describes itself as "a (SSV) Single Source Vendor" that builds "everything from scratch, we do not take a 3rd party product, rebrand it and promote it as our own", with "over 70 qualified and experienced members" on the payroll, and says that as an SSV "the IP (Intellectual Property) and source code belongs to TeamForce". Note the direction of that sentence — it explains why they can customise freely, not that a client receives source code or escrow.

There is no public API surface. No REST, GraphQL, WebSocket or webhook capability is documented, no SDK languages are listed, and there is no sandbox. /docs/, /api/, /developers/ and /developer/ all return 404 as of 19 September 2026. A firm that wants to build its own tooling on top should assume integration work goes through TeamForce's developers.

TeamForce Technologies publishes no pricing at all. There is no pricing page — /pricing/, /prices/ and /plans/ each return 404, checked 19 September 2026 — and no monetary amount, setup fee, per-account charge, revenue share or free trial appears on the home, products, services, about, contact or 3rd-parties pages. Every commercial call to action is a conversation: "BOOK A DEMO" and "BOOK A FREE CONSULTATION".

So the prop firm white label cost question cannot be answered from public sources, and no estimate is offered here. What can be said is which cost lines are likely to sit outside a headline licence, based on how the product is described: hosting and maintenance are listed as separate ancillary services; the platforms, PSPs, KYC vendors and VoIP providers it integrates with are third parties a firm contracts and pays for itself; and bespoke work is positioned as a custom build by its own development team.

For a buyer, that makes the first call a pricing discovery exercise. Establish whether the licence is a flat monthly platform fee, per seat, per active account or a hybrid; what the one-off implementation charge is; whether hosting is bundled or billed; what the minimum term is; and which modules from the list of ten are in the base price versus chargeable extras. Nothing in the public record constrains any of those answers, so there is no published benchmark to negotiate against.

No onboarding process is published. TeamForce gives no time to launch, no project stages, no statement on who manages the delivery, and no training offer. The closest the marketing comes to a timeline is "Skip months of integration. Go live instantly" and a post titled "Launch Your Brokerage in TeamForce Time" — neither of which is a number, so no implementation estimate is recorded.

Migration is equally undocumented. TeamForce never names an incumbent system it migrates firms from, never describes a data migration process, and never states whether migration work is included in the fee. Its own 2025 review does acknowledge the problem as an industry complaint, listing that "Brokers complained that CRM deployment was too expensive and too long" among the year's pressures.

The practical read for an operator: treat the schedule as entirely negotiable and unproven from public evidence. Ask for a named project manager, a written stage plan with dates, a defined UAT period, and explicit answers on who supplies and cleans the data, who pays for migration, what training is delivered and in what format. Because the trading server, PSPs and KYC vendor are all third parties in this architecture, the critical path usually runs through those contracts rather than through the CRM itself.

There is no service level agreement in the public record — no uptime percentage, no latency figure, no first response target, no escalation path and no service credits. There is also no status page and no incident history: /status/ and /sla/ both return 404 as of 19 September 2026. Nothing on the site makes a 24/5 or 24/7 support claim.

The contact routes that do exist are a phone number, +357 96 077195, and two mailboxes, info@ and support@teamforcetechnologies.com, plus a contact form which requires email verification by a six-digit code before submission. There is no live chat widget on the home or contact page. The contact page lists office hours as Monday to Friday, 8.00 to 5.00, with Saturday and Sunday closed — office hours, not a support commitment, and a meaningful limitation for a firm whose traders are active around the clock and across time zones.

Inside the product, the communication stack is far richer than the vendor's own support channels: WhatsApp and Telegram, in-house P2P VoIP, call links, SMS, push notifications and an AI dialler. Those are tools the firm uses on its own traders, not ways to reach TeamForce.

For an operator running a live book, this is the thinnest area of the profile. Weekend and out-of-hours cover, a P1 definition and response time, a named escalation contact, and credits tied to downtime all need to be negotiated into the agreement, because none of them is promised publicly.

No security certification is evidenced. There is no SOC 2, ISO 27001 or PCI DSS claim, certificate number, issuing body or auditor named anywhere on the site, and there is no trust or security page — /security/ returns 404, checked 19 September 2026. This point needs stating clearly because the 3rd-parties page displays the logos of the FCA, ASIC, CySEC, the DFSA and other regulators: those sit in a partner and introductions wall alongside law firms and corporate service providers, and they are neither integrations nor certifications held by TeamForce.

What is documented is data protection. The published terms are a GDPR data processing agreement that names the client as controller and TeamForce as processor acting on the client's instructions. It grants the client, or an auditor it mandates, the right to audit TeamForce and its subcontractors; requires written notice before subcontractor changes, with a 30-day termination right if the client objects; and commits TeamForce to notify the client in writing without undue delay of data security violations and to document each one.

Technical measures are stated more loosely. The terms cite "Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) software which encrypts information you input", which supports encryption in transit, and then a "costume encryption algorithm (which is TeamForce CRM's IP), based on AES, MDS, and Rijndael". Because that describes a proprietary algorithm rather than a named standard applied to stored data, encryption at rest is not asserted here. A September 2026 post lists five security layers: VPN detection, two-factor authentication, role-based access, SmartLock and encrypted data protection, which supports MFA and role-based access.

Not evidenced at all: penetration testing frequency, backup schedule, disaster recovery objectives, single sign-on, audit logs, a bug bounty, and any named sub-processor list. A firm handling trader KYC documents should ask for all of these in writing.

Not one client is named publicly. There are no case studies, no customer logos identified as customers, no testimonials attributed to a named firm, and no client count. /clients/ and /case-studies/ both return 404 as of 19 September 2026. The 3rd-parties logo wall does contain broker brands, but the page frames the whole wall as a network of partners for introductions and never describes anyone on it as a customer — so no firm shown there is recorded as a client here, and none should be read as a reference.

Every scale figure is self-reported, undated and unverifiable. The about page claims the team dedicated "over 6 years to crafting exceptional broker software", with counters reading "+6 Years" Operation and "Decades" of Experience, and states "an in-house team of over 70 experienced developers"; the services page repeats "over 70 qualified and experienced members of our teams on our payroll". LinkedIn lists a 51-200 employee band and Founded 2019.

Those claims do not reconcile with the corporate record. The registered entity behind the brand, Powerforce Managment Ltd, carries registration number ΗΕ 447193 with a registration date of 17/05/2023 on a third-party registry mirror, and both teamforcetech.com and teamforcetechnologies.com were registered in February 2025. The brand does appear to predate the current site — an older presentation of "Team Force CRM" exists under the Power Force brand — but no independently verifiable founding date was found, so no founding year is recorded.

The verifiable track record is therefore the third-party one: a cTrader CRM and mobile integration reported in November 2025, a Match-Trader integration reported in February 2026, a Chief Sales Officer appointment reported in February 2025, and a regular exhibitor presence at iFX Expo events in Dubai, Cyprus, LATAM, Hong Kong and Forex Expo Dubai.

The commercial contract is not public. The only published legal document covering the service is a GDPR data processing addendum, and it refers throughout to a separate "Standard Terms and Condition" agreement that is not on the site. As a result minimum term, notice period, auto-renewal, cancellation rights, service credits and liability cap are all undisclosed, and no governing law or jurisdiction clause appears in the published terms.

Data ownership is the one clearly settled point, and it favours the firm: the client is the controller and TeamForce the processor, acting on the client's instructions. On exit, "Upon the expiry of the Agreement, TeamForce Technologies shall, according to the Client's choice, either delete all personal data processed on behalf of the Client or return it to the Client and delete all copies of it", unless law or a regulator requires retention. During the agreement TeamForce will not delete client data unless asked to.

Two further clauses are worth knowing. TeamForce may appoint subcontractors to process personal data and must identify them in writing on request; it must give written notice before changing or adding one, and if the client does not approve, TeamForce "has the right to terminate the Agreement by giving 30 days' notice" — a termination right that runs in the vendor's favour, triggered by the client's objection. Liability is a mutual indemnity for failure to comply with the terms or the GDPR, including GDPR fines, rather than a capped commercial liability.

What is missing that an operator should insist on in writing: the return format and a time window for data export, an offboarding support period, an uptime commitment with credits, a liability cap, the governing law, and the identity of sub-processors before signing.