Skip to main content
Find your stackTake the quiz
16 verified providers mapped - not sure where to start?Take the quiz
Prop Tech Pal
Prop Tech Pal

Independent Tech Provider Data & Comparisons

FPFX Tech vs YourPropFirm

Every figure below is computed from the same normalised dataset, so the two vendors are measured on identical terms — including the ones they would rather you compared on a call.

FPFX Tech vs YourPropFirm — the short answer

FPFX Tech and YourPropFirm compared on deployment, integrations, risk tooling, SLA, security and contract terms. YourPropFirm names 28 integrations against 25 for FPFX Tech. Across 11 directly comparable measures, FPFX Tech leads on 2, YourPropFirm on 4 and 5 are tied; a further 24 rows carry no winner, either because the better answer depends on the firm you are running or because one side publishes nothing.

FPFX Tech

27/100 · Mostly sales-led

How much FPFX Tech publishes — not how good it is

YourPropFirm

70/100 · Publishes most of it

How much YourPropFirm publishes — not how good it is

2

Measures where FPFX Tech leads

4

Measures where YourPropFirm leads

5

Measures where they are level

24

Rows with no winner

Where FPFX Tech wins

2
  • Prop firms currently powered150
  • Years in market6

Where YourPropFirm wins

4
  • Risk engine capabilities5 capabilities
  • Named integrations28
  • Of those, shipped natively9
  • Security practices published6 practices

Side by side

36

A value in green is more favourable to the buying firm on a measure with a defensible direction — a lower cost, a shorter lock-in, a published figure where the other side publishes none. Rows where the better choice depends on how you intend to run the firm, such as deployment model or hosting region, are left plain.

Cost

Publishes a price at all

A vendor that will not quote a number in public cannot be shortlisted on cost, only on a call.

Quote only

Not published

Costs the headline price excludes

Data feeds, liquidity, premium support tiers — the parts of the bill that arrive later.

MetaTrader (MT4/MT5) licensing from MetaQuotes, described as separate with substantial setup and ongoing fees

Expert services — risk as a service, dedicated tech and support teams, web development, HR and recruitment, marketing and PR, reputation management, consulting and payment-solutions introductions, The firm's own PSP merchant accounts and their fees, Usage above the contracted tier, billed at the order-form overage rate in arrears, VAT, GST, withholding and other taxes, which are excluded from fees

Product

Services offered

Risk engine, CRM, Back office, Payments, KYC +2 more

Risk engine, CRM, Back office, Payments, KYC +2 more

Module categories covered

How much of the stack one contract covers. Fewer categories is not worse — a focused risk engine may beat a suite.

Risk Engine, CRM, Other, Affiliate

CRM, Risk Engine, Analytics, Other, Payments +3 more

Risk engine capabilities

4 capabilities

5 capabilities

Back-office capabilities

4 capabilities

4 capabilities

White label

Yes

Yes

Branding control

Logo, Colours, Custom domain

Logo, Colours, Full CSS/theme +3 more

Integrations & reach

Platforms supported

MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader +4 more

MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader +3 more

Trader terminals

MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade +4 more

MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade +3 more

Asset classes

Forex, CFDs, Futures, Crypto

Forex, CFDs, Futures

Named integrations

Counts what the vendor names publicly, whether it ships natively, is a supported partner, or is something you build against their API.

25

28

Of those, shipped natively

"Ships it" and "connects to it" are different purchases. Only the first needs no work from you.

2

9

API surface

Not published

REST, Webhooks

Sandbox environment

Not published

Yes

SDK languages

Not published

Node.js, Python, Go, PHP +2 more

Running it

Time to go live

The vendor’s own figure. Where they quote a range, the upper bound is used.

Not published

~10 days

Deployment models

SaaS, white label, self-hosted and on-premise are different products with different obligations — neither column wins by default.

SaaS, White Label

SaaS, White Label

Hosting regions

Not published

EU, Asia (Singapore)

Public status page

The cheapest available check on whether a vendor is honest about its own incidents.

Not published

Yes

Support channels

Email, Ticket portal

Email, Slack Connect

Support hours

24/7

24/7 on enterprise plans

Dedicated account manager

Not published

Yes

Migration support off an incumbent

Yes

Yes

Training included

Not published

Yes

Security & track record

Security practices published

4 practices

6 practices

Data residency options

US, EU

EU, Singapore

Prop firms currently powered

A vendor-reported figure. Scale is evidence of durability, not of fit for your firm.

150

85

Named client firms

Only firms one side or the other names publicly. Confidential clients are excluded by design.

Not published

FundedX

Years in market

6

4

Headquarters

Boca Raton, United States

Singapore, Singapore

Prop Tech Pal verification

Verified

Verified

Contract & exit

Notice period to cancel

Not published

60 days

Who owns your data

The single most expensive line in a prop tech contract to get wrong.

Not published

The firm owns its data, brand assets and configuration; YourPropFirm owns the platform, its code and improvements.

Offboarding support

Not published

Yes

Disclosure grade

Prop Tech Pal’s own measure of how much of the diligence surface the vendor publishes. It grades transparency, never product quality.

D (27/100)

B (70/100)

Money figures are normalised: twelve months on the cheapest recurring tier plus any published setup fee, excluding per-account and revenue-share components, which depend on your own volume. Prop Tech Pal does not sell placement in this comparison — how every figure here is computed is set out in full on the methodology page.

Ask on the first call

9

Everything below is missing from the public record, so this comparison cannot settle it. A vendor not publishing something is not evidence of anything — it is a question you have to ask rather than look up.

A public price

FPFX Tech

Contract length and notice period

FPFX Tech

Data ownership and export on exit

FPFX Tech

Named security certifications

FPFX Tech

An uptime figure or status page

FPFX Tech

A time to go live

FPFX Tech

A public API surface

FPFX Tech

A public price

YourPropFirm

Named security certifications

YourPropFirm

Frequently asked questions

7

Neither vendor publishes a price we can normalise. At least one of them quotes every deal individually. That is common in this market and is not by itself a red flag, but it does mean the only way to compare them on cost is to take both to a quote with the same account volume, the same modules and the same contract length, and compare the two proposals rather than the two websites.

Notice to cancel is Not published and 60 days respectively. On data, FPFX Tech states nothing publicly and YourPropFirm states The firm owns its data, brand assets and configuration; YourPropFirm owns the platform, its code and improvements.. Read the term alongside the exit: a short notice period on a long minimum term is not flexibility.

FPFX Tech quotes Not published to go live and YourPropFirm quotes ~10 days. Both are vendor-stated and both assume you arrive with your entity, banking, KYC provider and rule set already decided — in practice the vendor is rarely the long pole. On migration off an incumbent, FPFX Tech offers support and YourPropFirm offers support.

FPFX Tech names 25 integrations, 2 of them native and supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, Rithmic, Tradovate, Proprietary web platform. YourPropFirm names 28, 9 native and supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, Rithmic, TradingView. Check the type as well as the count: something that ships natively costs you nothing to turn on, a partner integration usually costs a second contract, and an API-only integration is engineering work you own.

Neither we nor anyone else can answer that from public data — what we can tell you is what each publishes. FPFX Tech names no certifications and publishes 4 security practices; YourPropFirm names none and publishes 6. YourPropFirm runs a public status page, which is the cheapest available signal that a vendor reports its own incidents. Ask both for the current report, not the badge.

FPFX Tech scores 27/100 on our disclosure grade (D — mostly sales-led) and YourPropFirm scores 70/100 (B). FPFX Tech does not publish: a public price; contract length and notice period; data ownership and export on exit; named security certifications; an uptime figure or status page; a time to go live; a public api surface. YourPropFirm does not publish: a public price; named security certifications. The grade measures transparency, not quality — a strong vendor with a sales-led motion can score badly. Use the gaps as the agenda for the first call.

Stay Ahead in Prop Firm Tech

Compare verified providers, track new integrations, and get vendor pricing updates as they land.

Exclusive dealsFree giveawaysVerified firms

All information provided on this site is intended solely for educational and informational purposes related to prop firm technology and does not serve in any way as a specific procurement recommendation, business recommendation, investment opportunity analysis, or similar general recommendation.

Prop Tech Pal provides comparison, review, and educational resources only. We do not operate as a proprietary trading firm, technology vendor, broker, or custodian, do not offer simulated trading accounts or evaluations, and do not provide execution or custody of funds.

The information on this site is not directed at residents in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local laws or regulations.

Prop Tech Pal does not act as a broker and does not accept any deposits.

Data, tools, and third-party references on this site are provided for informational purposes; availability and accuracy may depend on third-party sources outside our control.

© 2026 Prop Tech Pal. All rights reserved.